The Libertarian Argument

This is not about refuting the entire Libertarian philosophy, it’s merely about the flat assertion that governments should have no right to regulate what we do at home, in public or in our places of business.  I disagree.  I think that so long as the choices we make affect those around us, the group should have access to some mechanism to to encourage or discourage behaviors that harm the group.  We can decide, as a community, what the consequences are for these actions.  That might involve strict guidelines, prohibitions, or just education and awareness.  The point of this video isn’t which approach is most effective, but merely that the group should be able to demand social justice when one person’s dangerous action endanger the rest of the community.

39 comments on “The Libertarian Argument

  1. Another important thing about Ramadan is the night of ‘Laila – tul-
    Qadar’, (a night which is far better than thousand nights).
    It is my understanding that Muslims who are not fasting for various legitimate reasons (e.
    These Islamic books are meant for the age group 7-10 years.

  2. If you do your cleanse and eat a healthy diet with mostly fruits and vegetables
    and very little red meat or no meat at all you will feel lighter.
    Whenever you purchase Vega, be sure you buy it from recognized retailers to achieve the
    real merchandise. No wonder that Spirulina, has been declared by World Health Organization (WHO) as.

  3. These wastes aare a result of the food we eat, our environment and lifestyle.
    When you by a Jupiter Micro – Lite Water Ionizer you will bbe tzking the first step towards inaugurating the harmonizing
    of your essential internal p – H towards its suitable level.
    You need to be drinking lots of good water too flush out the toxins and hewvy metals clogging
    your body. The suffering continued through college (where I
    studied nutrition, psychology, astronony and especijally art) andd into my work years.
    It includes my comprehensive water ionizer evaluations, including p – H tests, ORP
    tests, video evaluations, spec sheets, aand contrast charts.
    Fortunately, acidic water has a vaeiety of benefits as well.

  4. I’ve been browsing online greater than 3 hours as of late, but I by no means found any attention-grabbing article like yours.
    It’s lovely worth sufficient for me. In my view, if all
    site owners and bloggers made excellent content as you did, the net will likely be much more helpful than ever

  5. As pre-mentioned these vary depending on what type of card
    you have. At the very least, you are showing that you value the others enough to provide a limousine for transportation. The interiors of Lincoln Town Car Stretch Limousine are same to those
    of Stretch Hummer Limousine.

  6. Hola! I’ve been reading your website for some time now and finally got
    the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Houston Tx!

    Just wanted to mention keep up the great job!

  7. Hi! I’ve been reading your site for a long time now
    and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Austin Texas!
    Just wanted to mention keep up the fantastic job!

  8. I am curious which blogging and site-building platform you might be
    using? I’m new to running a blog and have been thinking about using
    the Quizilla platform. Do you think this is a good platform to start with?
    I would be really thankful if I could ask you some questions through email so
    I can learn a bit more prior to getting started. When you have some free time, please be sure to get in touch with
    me at: Appreciate it

  9. Main dining hall times frequently begin around 6:30 p.
    s although parents tend to hire the services of the
    same sitter frequently. Au pair jobs London brings families and au pairs close to
    make a deal.

  10. I think that what you published made a bunch of sense.
    However, think on this, suppose you added a little information? I am not suggesting your information isn’t solid, however what if
    you added a headline that makes people desire more? I mean The
    Libertarian Argument | c0nc0rdance is a little plain. You ought to look at
    Yahoo’s front page and note how they create post titles
    to grab viewers to click. You might add a video
    or a pic or two to grab people interested about
    what you’ve written. In my opinion, it could bring
    your posts a little livelier.

  11. Colors are reproduced to an acceptable level, and the blacks are distinguishable from the grays, however
    while being bright, colors are slightly washed
    out, and small text can be hard to read, especially on web pages.
    Things like Whispersync, X-ray, and Amazon Prime really illustrate how Amazon is trying to create their own experience.
    Santa Cruz has a north and south rivalry though we call
    it east and west because it is based on whether you are on east or west Beach St.

  12. Considering a lot of fast food food for a group of three will be anywhere from $15 for
    you to $20 each, it’s definitely worth the idea to plan your grocery
    collection and prepare dinners at home Keep an eye on the rise and also fall interesting rates, after which
    it act accordingly to attack when the rates are small In addition we discovered that the intention of these companies isn’t
    necessarily to get you for you to agree to a loan, per se, but rather
    they want to obtain the “initiation” or “filing” charges from you which can be associated with the financial loan Your 1
    role would be to pay the interest rates and lower
    your expenses to pay the financial loan back If you really need a loan,
    and also you really are a student, realize that you really suffer
    alternatives We excited in the cowboy aspects of my pops as much as
    we’re proud of the pup as a science tecnistions Find out about the
    loans offered and which might be best for your circumstances before you utilize Because of its conditions, borrowers need to provide posting dated
    cheques towards money financial institution which can be cashed on their future salary
    time There are tons regarding companies around, find the
    right sure payday loan in your case Loan providers cannot rely on one person who has already busted their confidence For most of folks, unsecured credit card individual financial loans in many cases are one of the best and finest preference
    Along with the asked for company data, you find organizations
    in the exact line of business, listed around as well as within your enterprise information Which means
    they have paid for The fact is that, and in component due to the way good news media features focused
    on the activities of those who visit”” and also go the French Quarter “”after”” the particular parades, it currently appears that every one many think about when they notice the words “”Mardi Gras””are activities occurring inside French Fraction; i” As a consequence of rising valuation on production in mining regarding gold, regular strikes from the miners, declining politics situation, abrupt rise in this oil rates after the Iraq war, home loan business the precious metal production continues to be noticed in the last five years However, this storing up needs to be part of the weekly or even monthly shopping budget If the hard drive is broken, make sure you protect it from punctures from further damage as often you possibly can so that data recovery can be carried out easily and successfully in the future, in case the travel contains very important or sensitive data like passwords, financial institution details, charge card information, and many others, I would recommend you don’t compromise for data recovery options, and buy the best data recovery plan to recover computer data They could nevertheless say ‘it might not be very easy’ nonetheless notice that they can be still likely to use the expression ‘easy’ When you are having less-than-perfect credit score then you’ll not be able to purchase ideal house or perhaps car You may simply copy and paste a new Wonga promo code and enter it again when you find yourself finished with your financial loan information College education can be anything but inexpensive, and as the personal loans taken out to cover tuition rates and cost of living grow, college students eventually confront a huge financial debt

  13. Whats up this is kinda of off topic but I was wanting to know
    if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML.

    I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding experience so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience.

    Any help would be enormously appreciated!

  14. It’s actually a nice and useful piece of info.

    I am happy that you just shared this useful information with us.
    Please stay us informed like this. Thanks for sharing.

  15. As I pointed out on the video site, your arguement presumes that the nonworker is nevertheless cared for on the island. In fact, under a Libertarian system, no work = no pay. “Ron Paul” in your scenario can go live on the island without helping only if he is independently self-sufficent. There’s no requirement for the others to feed, house or alert him as to any rescue. Moreover, if “RP” doesn’t want to do X, maybe the group should discuss and bargain as to who does what and if any jobs should be rotated. I wouldn’t want to be 100% the “latrine person” while someone else did the fishing if I was reasonably competent at fishing. Libertarian does not mean “never cooperates” and “never compromises”. It means never FORCED to do so. As for insurance, the basic principal of insurance is that you will spend more money on the insurance than they will spend on you in the long term. Insurance companies are not there to lose money. Spreading risk means an individual can get more than they pay if the group still spends more (and an Insurer will take on a greater risk in an individual if the overall group still brings a profit). If there is NO insurance, and the Govt opts to “pay as you go” and charge via taxes for the cost, then inevitably, some people will pay more than they would otherwise and some will get more benefit than the $ they put in. The issue is then, how much risk should the group pay for and how much responsibilty should the individual bear? All the possible health impacts on babies based on what their mother did — should we charge her for it? Smoke? Should we then pay for your cancer treatment? Should we ban skateboarding or skiing because of injury risk? How much care does the “lifeboat” provide and how much control? In a libertarian system, you form your OWN groups instead of the Government imposing them. Each group makes up it’s own internal rules on payments, risks, coverage.

  16. I want to explain why I have no faith in the chart you show at 5:17.

    I went to the ER a few years ago with a case of acute bronchitis. It was a Sunday. I began getting ill on the previous Thursday. I coughed blood on Saturday. I could tell that something was wrong with my right lung. It hurt when a breathed. I woke up Sunday morning feeling like death warmed over. I had a fever and I wasn’t breathing well. I was scared. I had no idea what was ailing me. I was afraid I had lung cancer.

    I arrived at hospital ER and was given an EKG. I knew I wasn’t having a heart problem. The EKG was perfectly normal. They took blood and didn’t tell me what they would do with it. I got a lung x-ray. Was given some oxygen, and walked out with prescription for an inhaler and antibiotics. The total time in the emergency room was less than one hour. I recovered quickly from the bronchitis.

    About two weeks later I was billed $4,500 from the hospital. I called them and explained that I didn’t have that kind of money. Much of the bill was for lab work on my blood to see if I had a heart attack, but my vital signs and EKG were perfectly normal. The hospital billing person told me that I could receive a discount if I paid early. I asked how much I needed to produce and she told me 15% of the bill and I would be clear. I went to the hospital and cut them a check for $650 on the spot. I was also billed for the x-ray. This cost $40. I wonder if the $4,500 – $650 balance is included in the total on your pie chart.

    I then received a bill from the ER doctor. He wanted $950 for his services. I thought this was gouging. I wasn’t at the ER for more than an hour. I know he wasn’t on the case the entire time. He looked at an x-ray an ekg and some lab work and wrote me a prescription. I called his billing people but they would not negotiate the price down. I offered him $300 for his services. They won’t take the offer. It was $950 or nothing. I went back to hospital and the social worker was able to forgive the bill. I asked for documentation on the invoice the word “charity” was written, so I know that $950 is included on the total on your pie chart.

    My assessment from this experience is that hospitals and providers who work in hospitals over bill people who have no insurance. I understand that medical degrees and malpractice insurance cost money, but the rate I was billed at was completely insane. The procedure that involved the most expensive equipment was the x-ray. It only cost $40.

    Since that hospital visit a had cataract removed by a first rate ophthalmologist. When I called him they quoted a price of $225 for the initial examination and $2500 for the cataract removal. The $225 brought me about 90 minutes of doctor face time and examination on several extremely expensive looking pieces of equipment. The $2500 brought me an outpatient procedure complete with anesthesia. I have a DVD of the procedure. It took about 20 minutes, but it is very exacting and risky work. I also got two follow up visits included in that price. I didn’t negotiate the price at all. They advertised it. I paid it.

    I think the over billing is the more important issue to deal with than getting everybody insured. I think there is a kind of unholy preferred customer alliance between hospitals and insurance companies. I’m sure that if I had insurance when I had the bronchitis they wouldn’t have paid the hospital $4,500 and the doctor $950.

    • Hospitals bill only very loosely based on the cost of materials and equipment needed. The reasons that bills for the same procedure can vary so widely from hospital to hospital is that hospitals have a lot of overhead, nurses, lab techs, managers, sanitizers, cleaning staff, laundry, sterilization, etc etc, and that overhead is worked into the bill based on formulas that vary from hospital to hospital. As to why the doctor charged you so much…I have no idea. Also, it’s possible for there to have been a heart attack, and the ekg after to show normal…hence the enzyme studies.

      • No way in hell what they did for me was worth $4,500 dollars.

        I was on a bed in the ER with a disposable sheet. I didn’t utilize the laundry service. A car dealership has cleaning staff, but you don’t get nearly as much variance from car dealership to car dealership in the price of a vehicle.

        “Also, it’s possible for there to have been a heart attack, and the ekg after to show normal…hence the enzyme studies.”

        I had no symptoms of a heart attack. The pain was on the right side of my chest and it only hurt when I inhaled. Anything is possible. That doesn’t mean it’s reasonable to test for everything. They didn’t test me for TB. That would have been more likely than a heart attack.

        • There is also that matter that hospitals have to cover those who don’t pay, especially in the ER, which the poor frequently use as primary care adding a very large number of unpaid visits, by splitting those costs among those who do.

          Don’t make me go through the whole deal about how heart attacks don’t always have classic symptoms, and they couldn’t know you didn’t have a heart attack without testing you. What I would have tested you for was a PE, though.

          I’m not going to say for certain there wasn’t something shady going on, I just want to point out that it’s not as simple to price hospital care as it is a carton of milk.

        • “Don’t make me go through the whole deal about how heart attacks don’t always have classic symptoms…”

          Most do. Silent heart attacks are not very common, especially in people in their early forties with no risk factors. A pulmonary embolism? These usually involve cardiac symptoms. I had a fever. The diagnosis of bacterial infection was fairly obvious.

          “There is also that matter that hospitals have to cover those who don’t pay, especially in the ER, which the poor frequently use as primary care adding a very large number of unpaid visits, by splitting those costs among those who do.”

          This is why we need public health care. Hospitals should not be forced to tax everybody who walks in the door because some people can’t pay anything. Every other civilized nation in the world has it.

        • I agree completely. And we need tort reform, so that medical professionals can practice for the patient, instead of for the lawyers — which is what I think was going on in your case.
          (And a PE doesn’t always have cardiac symptoms, my daughter’s got misdiagnosed as a respiratory infection twice before someone finally got it.)

        • If the government would stop mandating that a doctor review every case the cost would probably drop quite a bit as well. From the sound of it, a nurse practitioner could have taken care of you just fine… Instead, you were charged for a doctor, along with the fees, taxes and other costs incurred by hiring the doctor (malpractice, 8 years of medical school, etc) when someone with quite a bit less expertise would’ve done an adequate job.

          There’s no reason to drive a nail with a sledgehammer and there’s no reason that anyone with some basic medical knowledge and internet access couldn’t have come to the same conclusion as the doctor did.

          In my experience (my wife worked at a hospital for a few years checking people in and out of urgent care) hospitals have a standard protocol of overtreating patients. Partly to avoid malpractice but mostly because everything that was done for you that day would’ve been paid for by insurance, no questions asked. It’s like taking a car to a mechanic and telling them repairs will be covered by your collision insurance no matter what they need to do to fix it. You’ll get a lot of unnecessary services. The problem is that hospitals are not allowed by law to follow different procedures for patients without insurance; so they end up overtreating and overbilling everyone…

          Government interference is at the root of the problem. Over half of all US medical costs are born by the government in the US and people with medical coverage don’t bother shopping around for cheaper cost of care. At the same time insurance companies are required to pay for any costs incurred during a hospital stay. This leads to massive overtreatment and huge bills for simple services. The same people who run the government agencies responsible for health care either currently, at some time in the past or at some time in the future are part of the “private” health care industry. Even while in office they receive quite a bit of under the table stuff from the industry they’re supposed to be regulating.

          In other words they have every incentive to raise the cost of care and no incentive to please the taxpayers by lowering costs since taxes are taken by force rather than voluntarily paid to the government. And “consumers” of this “free” (read: paid for by someone else) health care have no incentive to reduce their spending on health care since it doesn’t cost them anything personally.

        • @Josh Acquard
          While the American system is poorly designed if you meant to assert that government interference itself is bad your conclusion does not follow from your evidence. The UK system which is less than half the price (per citizen) of the American one and gives better outcomes than the American one. This does not mean that it is good, just that the less regulated American system is worse. The fact that the American regulatory framework is stupid does not mean that regulation is bad on principal.

          The most obvious example of where subsidy is good is that you DO want to pay for everyone else’s vaccinations, as they are not 100% but having others protected reduces infection and reduces spread and therefore protects you.

          Note also that for-profit unregulated hospitals have a huge incentive to over treat for profit. So saying that over treatment would be solved by reducing regulation is at least an unfounded assertion, unless you have some comparable system to use as evidence. Also how often do heart attack victims get to shop around?

        • Just because having everyone vaccinated is better than having only some people vaccinated doesn’t mean that you have the right to use force to pay for it. What gives you the right to pay someone to point a gun at me to pay for anyone’s medical costs?

          I may want to pay for vaccines for other people. You don’t know if I do or not. My point is that just because one or more parties are willing does not change the fact that some are not. Rape does not equal making love and theft does not equal charitable contributions. Regardless of what the money is for, taxation is theft and forcing people to pay for services they don’t want to pay for is wrong. As is telling people what they can charge for a service and who they can accept payment from.

          For profit hospitals only have an incentive to overtreat because insurance companies pay for services that are not needed. In many cases they have to pay for these services by law. As I mentioned, hospitals are not allowed to change the level of care in order to save patients money and so they overtreat the patients that can’t afford it in order to get the maximum payout from the ones who are covered.

          Emergency care patients could shop around ahead of time. All they need to do is have a medic alert bracelet (similar to an allergy bracelet) with their preferred hospital listed on it. I’m not saying that it is the normal practice for people to have one. What I am saying is that it is possible, especially if you’re conscious to tell EMTs where to take you. Unless local regulations require that you be taken to the closest facility. In that case you are again being forced to use a service that you do not want.

        • @Josh Acquard
          I will start with your emotive read herrings
          Do you actually know the law in England at all? Cops do not normally carry guns and are not allowed to use lethal force unless you threaten someone else’s life. Equating tax to rape and theft is also a good touch, nice debating strategy there.

          On to your real arguments
          1. that the government does not have the right to infringe on your property.
          All rights are relative. The American constitution and the British system of laws do both protect from UNREASONABLE government imposition but I put that word in capitals for a reason. There is no protection from reasonable imposition. If society thinks that taxes are reasonable then you either need to change society or move before you have any right to complain.

          2. that “profit hospitals only have an incentive to overtreat because insurance companies pay for services that are not needed.”
          Sorry but no. If you can afford a treatment and it can be made to sound necessary then there is a profit incentive to do so even if it comes with a hinger risk of death. If there is a less effective treatment that gives a higher total profit, then there is a incentive to use it. Without several years of training you have no idea when they are exaggerating or overstating their case.
          Insurance increases the amount of treatment you can afford both for good and for ill, but does not cause the problem. Removing it won’t solve anything, cutting the total amount of good treatment along with the bad. (America’s bad regulation is *still* not an argument against others more regulated better designed systems)

          3. “Emergency care patients could shop around ahead of time”
          I used heart attack victims for a reason, for several types of urgent care getting to the hospital fast has a huge affect on survival rate. You can shop around but you are much more likely to die if you do, how is this any real choice?

        • I’ll answer your points in the order you’ve given them. “Cops do not normally carry guns and are not allowed to use lethal force unless you threaten someone else’s life.” So if they came to take you to jail for non-payment of taxes and you fought them with lethal force, as you might any kidnapper, they wouldn’t use lethal force against you?

          1) “If society thinks that taxes are reasonable then you either need to change society or move before you have any right to complain.” So If society felt it was right to execute me for having blue eyes (or enslave me based on the color of my skin) you would expect me to move out of the country? Just because “society”, which is really just a group of people, says that something is right does not make it so and how could I change society without speaking out against the injustices that I see? (what you’ve called complaining)

          2) You have a point that both good and bad treatment will drop (temporarily) if insurance is not forced upon people. The benefit that I believe would come out of it is that the cost of treatment overall would drop and people would be able to afford more treatment on their own. For the record I am also for having less barriers to entry to allow more competition. Competition almost always leads to innovation, greater access to a product and lower prices.

          3) “You can shop around but you are much more likely to die if you do, how is this any real choice?” There is an option, therefore it is by definition a choice. Just because you don’t like the options doesn’t mean there is not a choice available.
          From Wikipedia: Choice consists of the mental process of judging the merits of multiple options and selecting one of them.

          Here are a few points that you didn’t bring up.

          1)If I have something that you think you need and you convince the rest of the town that we live in that you need it. Is it right for you to demand that thing of me? If I try to stop you from taking that thing, am I then a criminal?

          2)You assume that taxation is NOT theft. How so? Explain to me how a person taking something from me without my permission is not theft. Also from Wikipedia: In common usage, theft is the taking of another person’s property without that person’s permission or consent with the intent to deprive the rightful owner of it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s